Review of Albarelli’s Coup in Dallas
John
Delane Williams
H. P.
Albarelli’s post-humous book, Coup in Dallas: The Decisive Investigation
into Who Killed JFK (2021) can be described as a research process that
begins its story much earlier that most writings that address the crime of the
twentieth century, going back to the F.D. Roosevelt administration. Albarelli’s
research is clearly a contribution, but still needs to be read with a critical
eye. Albarelli had written two previous books of interest. A Terrible
Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA’s Secret Cold War Experiments (2009)
described apparently misguided military research of lysergic acid diethylamide
(LSD) that clearly violates the rights of unsuspecting persons subjected to it.
Dr. Frank
Olson was a chemist for the military, but was “on loan” to the CIA. Olson had been involved in a couple of
situations that caused him some remorse, and apparently mentioned it to
someone. He was deliberately given LSD in a drink. Several other CIA co-workers
also consumed LSD in drinks. Olson had a bad “trip”, and the plan was to take
him by automobile to a CIA treatment facility in Maryland. The plan would have
included George White and one accomplice, who likely would have been Jean LaFitte. However,
White’s mother was quite ill in California, and White went to see her; she
passed away, and White remained there for her burial. LaFitte chose as his
backup Francois Spirito, recently released from prison, a long- time companion
of LaFitte from their youth in Marseille. In the Statler Hotel in New York on
November 28, 1953, a struggle took place between Olson and the two men (LaFitte
and Spirito) trying to remove him from a hotel room on the 13th
floor (though the room number was 1018A). During the struggle, Olson was
pitched head first out the closed window. He landed on his feet but was killed
by the impact of the fall.
A
second book, A Secret Order Investigating the High Strangeness and
Synchronicity of the JFK Assassination (2013) include several instances of
very unusual circumstances. One such circumstance (also summarized in Williams 2019,
2022) occurred with a young scientist, Adele Edisen. She was a post-doctoral
fellow with the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness. Her
contact person at the Institute was Dr. Jose Rivera. Edisen was meeting with
Rivera in April 1963. At a dinner meeting, Rivera told Edisen, “When you go to
Dallas, you should go to the Carousel Club because it is a very nice night club.”.
Then Rivera asked, “Do you know Lee Harvey Oswald?” Edisen replied, “No”.
Rivera stated that Oswald had lived in the Soviet Union, married a Soviet
citizen, had a child, and that they soon would be moving to New Orleans. Rivera
suggested getting to know them, because they were a lovely couple. Then Rivera
gave Edisen the Oswald upcoming telephone number, 899-4244. Upon returning to
New Orleans, Edisen called the number; she was told that no one by the name of
Oswald lived at that address. One week later, she tried the number again.
Oswald had just arrived. In finding out Oswald’s address Edisen realized that
was a somewhat run-down neighborhood, suggesting that Oswald was not a
scientist who was at the same status as Edison.
Rivera
then asked, as they drove by the White House, “What will Jackie do when her
husband dies?” Edisen exclaimed, “What?” Rivera then said, “I mean the baby.
She might lose the baby.” Rivera then
told Edisen to tell Oswald to “Kill the Chief. We are just playing a little
joke on him. It will happen when the Shriner’s convention comes to New Orleans.
That’s in November. It will happen after the Shriner’s come to New Orleans” (Albarelli,
2013, pp. 137-138). The question that comes to mind is, how does a person get
all of these details accurate seven months before they happen?”
Background of Jean Pierre LaFitte
Jean Pierre LaFitte was a remarkable man. A description of
him given by George White was, ”He was what you call a changling. I don’t mean
master of disguises. I mean an actual chameleon, a man that had the ability to
transform himself right in front of you. He would go from good to bad, from
rich to poor, from royalty to commoner, from intellectual to simpleton, from
hoodlum to police officer. He would
disappear for months or years at a time and then show up at your door, like
only a day or two had passed”. LaFitte used over 30 aliases
White
continued, “I liked him, but I never trusted him because he was always in the
game. He only loved and cared about his wife and children; everyone was fair
game in the scheme of things. He was the greatest imposter and confidence man
that ever lived, not because he was a good actor, but because he was a hundred
different people in one.” It seems LaFitte chose his own name. Most likely he
was born in New Orleans in either 1902, 1907 or 1912. However, there are
reports he was born in Corsica. His mother was a madam. They moved to Marseille
when Jean LaFitte was 7 years old. His mother was reportedly murdered about a
year later, though her body was never found. Relatives took him in, but he ran
away and lived on the streets. As a practical solution to his situation, he
would work in restaurants, which provided him with food, and a dry, warm place.
He also learned culinary skills, that would serve him well. LaFitte acquired
the skills of a chef.
LaFitte claimed he was descended from two
brothers, Jean and Pierre LaFitte, who lived in the 1800’s and were well known
pirates. In Laffite’s youth, he was involved with similarly situated youth;
many of them would be involved with drugs or other illegal activities. LaFitte
came to know quite a bit about drugs such as heroin. LaFitte was involved in
several nefarious activities but without being known for them. He apparently
was the person who convinced Joe Valachi to turn against the Mafia and testify
against the mob (Albarelli2021,pp. 87-121).
The LaFitte 1963 Notebook
As
Albarelli was finishing A Terrible Mistake. He became aware that LaFitte
and his wife Rene were living in New England; as Albarelli lived in Vermont, he
contacted Rene, who disclosed that her husband had died. ln their conversations, Rene mentioned that
her husband had several notebooks (1961-1964) . One that interested Albarelli
was the notebook for 1963. Albarelli went to see Rene’s lawyers; several
negotiations took place regarding Albarelli gaining access to the 1963
notebook. The agreement mentioned areas that were not to be disclosed. The
notebook was in code. One example, for
September 22, 1963 was
Oswald-Mex City Gaudet?
This was easier to read than some other entries. This likely
signified Oswald’s trip to Mexico. But what does the question mark mean? If the
Mexico City trip is being referred to, this is a report of Oswald’s activities.
It is likely that this information was given to LaFitte as one of the persons
whom information on Oswald was distributed. While Albarelli concludes that
LaFitte was the master planner behind the assassination, it seems the 1963
notebook more likely shows LaFitte to be a silent scribe, writing in code for
only himself. LaFitte’s widow stated that no one in the previous 40 years had
successfully gained access to his 1963 notebook. Given that George White was
LaFitte’s connection to the CIA, and White did not trust LaFitte, it seems
highly unlikely that LaFitte would be entrusted to being master planner for the
JFK assassination.
LaFitte in New Orleans
Lafitte purchased a house in Gretna Louisiana,
a suburb of New Orleans, in late 1961 or early 1962. He was employed briefly as
a maintenance worker at Reily Coffee for three months, before gaining
employment as chef at one of New Orleans finest restaurants. Lafitte was also
given the job of keeping track of Lee Harvey Oswald from the day Oswald was
hired at Reily Coffee. LaFitte would remain as a special agent with the CIA until
1978. In 1967, LaFitte became the manager and executive chef of the Plimsoll
Club, located in the International Trade Mart, which formerly was under the
direction of Clay Shaw, who particularly enjoyed the cuisine of LaFitte.
Planners and Decision Makers
The planners and
decision makers would include those who had the ability to give the go ahead
for the plan to remove President Kennedy by way of assassination. Albarelli
reasoned that persons within the CIA were involved, perhaps James J. Angleton.
Members of the military such as General Le May, might have been involved,
though his efforts may have been in the coverup of the assassination. (See
Horn, 2009, pp. 481-486). The inner
group who would make the decision could have been as few as three persons. The
name given to the Assassination was the Lancelot Project. Seemingly “up the
food chain” from LaFitte, Otto Skorzeny (a German Nazi during World War II), was
restricted to his home in Ireland or Franco’s Spain. Skorzeny informed LaFitte
on November 5, 1963 that the Lancelot Project was a go. Skorzeny and his wife
Ilsa were in the matrix of persons connected to the Lancelot Project.
Work
on the Book After Albarelli’s Death
Albarelli died in June 2019; Leslie Sharp and
Alan Kent helped in the planning of arranging Albarelli’s work for publication.
The Forward and an analysis of the LaFitte 1963 Notebook were done by Dick
Russell, author of The Man Who Knew Too Much (1992). The book is
followed by writings by co-authors Leslie Sharp and Alan Kent. Kent identified
a person referred to as Mr. T in the 1963 notebook. Kent concluded that Mr. T
was Tracey Barnes, a person who had served in the OSS and who moved on to the
CIA. Sharp (2021a) wrote of the
relationship with Albarelli and his suggestions regarding finishing off the
manuscript. One suggestion was, “I think serious consideration should be
given now to doing 3-4 end pages that speak generally to Fourth Reich. Rise
of----revamped to these times but true Nazism--- good way to end the book.”
(p. 474). Albarelli gave Sharp a book that he wanted her to read, Nazi Hydra
in America, by Yeadon & Hawkins (2008).
Sharp
(2021a) followed Albarelli’s suggestion in her Co-Author’s Postscript. The
America First Committee is traced to the 1930’s Their mantra was isolationism
with antisemitism. Those who were profascist might join the group to help keep
America from joining the effort to enter the European war against Hitler and
fascism. An alt-right movement was
becoming more prominent in America. The candidacy of Barry Goldwater in 1964
ended in his resounding defeat, but gave rise to the 1980 candidacy of Ronald
Reagan. While Albarelli did not address President Donald Trump, Sharp did. Patrick
Buchanan resurrected the ideas behind the America First Committee in his
several independent presidential campaigns; in his 1992 campaign, his slogan
was “Make America First Again”. According to Sharp, Trump is seen as following
the Buchanan presidential campaigns in the similar manner as Reagan followed the
ideas of the presidential campaign of Goldwater. It seems that at least the
slogan of the Trump campaign, “Make America Great Again” is very close to
Buchanan’s original slogan. But Goldwater was the established nominee of the
Republican party. Buchanan’s independent campaigns were far behind the two
major parties, not even comparable to the independent candidacies of Ross
Perot.
This
book seems to be one that should be read by persons interested in the JFK
assassination. It truly is an original book, and well worth reading.
Note: Pete Mellor (2022), in his annual review of books in
2021, had a half page review of Albarelli’s Coup in Dallas. In it he was
concerned about whether the 1963 Notebook was authentic. The notebook was being held in safe keeping for
LaFitte’s widow by her lawyers, and Albarelli had several negotiations with the
lawyers before the notebook was turned over to Albarelli. At this point, I
would be more concerned about the accuracy of the interpretations of Albarelli.
I would prefer several knowledgeable persons independently attempt to decode
the notebook, and then attempt to have meetings to hash out differences. Perhaps
several different interpretations would be the outcome. Leslie Sharp (2021b)
does do some interpretation on the use of the word “caretaker” in the notebook.
It was at least a start.
References
Albarelli, H.P. (2009) A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of
Frank Olson and the CIA’s Secret Cold War Experiments. Walterville OR:
Trine Day.
Albarelli, H.P. (2013). A Secret Order: Investigating the
High Strangeness and Synchronicity in the JFK Assassination. Walterville
OR: Trine Day.
Albarelli, H.P. (2021). Coup in Dallas. The Decisive Investigation
into Who Killed JFK. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.
Benson, M. (2002). Encyclopedia of the JFK Assassination.
New York: Checkmark Books.
Kent, A. (2021). A Well Concealed “T”. In Albarelli, H.P. Coup
in Dallas, pp. 491-505.
Mellor, P. (2022). JFK Assassination Books in 2021. Dealey
Plaza Echo. 25,1, 36-38.
Russell, D. (1992). The Man Who Knew Too Much. New
York: Carroll & Graf.
Sharp, L. (2021a). Co-Authors Postscript, in Albarelli, H.P.
Coup in Dallas, pp. 461-474.
Sharp, L. (2021b). “Caretaker” Analysis, in Albarelli H.P. Coup
in Dallas, pp. 509-527.
Williams, J.D. (2019). Lee Harvey Oswald, Lyndon Johnson
and the JFK Assassination. Walterville OR: Trine Day.
Williams, J.D. (2022). The State of Continuing Qualitative
Research on the Kennedy Assassination. Journal of Scientific Exploration,
36, 4, 655-668.
Yeardon, G. & Hawkins, J. (2008). Nazi Hydra in
America. Palm Desert CA.: Progressive Press.
Published in the Dealey Plaza Echo,60th
Anniversary Edition Part Two, 40-44.
No comments:
Post a Comment